A.P. Herbert
June, gentle June, of whom the crooners croon,
Sweet month of silk, of salmon, and the swoon;
June, what a chance you had—to be your best,
The fighting friend of Freedom in the West!
You could have said ‘I’ll give them placid seas,
Permitting nothing but an off-shore breeze;
Blue days for bombers on the Calais beat,
And not a cloud below three thousand feet;
Comfort for soldiers—safety for the tar:
May has her medals—June shall wear a Star!’
Instead, sweet June, how sadly you have sinned!
Henceforth, you little slut, your name is Wind,
Hail, Gale or Thunder, Cold or Cloud, or Sleet.
June, you’re a quisling; June, you are a cheat.
If there is any trick you’ve left undone
That helps the enemy, pray tell me one?
And yet, in spite of your obscene display,
Oh, what a month—a winner all the way!
This is the song that History will croon:
‘How we Defied the Traitor, General June!’
© by owner. provided at no charge for educational purposes
Analysis (AI Assisted)
This poem takes an unorthodox approach to a familiar subject: the month of June, which in the context of the Second World War, was expected to be a symbol of hope and victory. Instead, the speaker lambasts June as a traitor, using hyperbole and playful invective to criticize its failure to live up to its promise during the war.
At first, June is introduced with a traditional, almost romantic description: “sweet month of silk, of salmon, and the swoon.” This idyllic image paints June as a gentle and pleasant month—full of beauty and calm. But the poem quickly turns this initial impression on its head by suggesting that June had the potential to be so much more. It could have been the “fighting friend of Freedom in the West” by providing ideal weather for the war effort: clear skies for bombers, smooth seas for naval operations, and a calm environment for soldiers on the front lines.
The language used to describe June’s potential is almost nostalgic—there is an implicit yearning for what June could have been, had it been more cooperative. Phrases like “Comfort for soldiers—safety for the tar” evoke a sense of a perfect, peaceful world where the soldiers could rest easy. This month, the poet suggests, could have been a “Star,” a time of victory, contrast to May, which was filled with medals, possibly alluding to the successful military campaigns of that earlier month.
However, June’s betrayal begins with the turn of the poem. The speaker accuses June of having “sinned” by failing to live up to its idealistic potential. The month is scorned with harsh, almost vindictive words, such as “slut,” “quisling,” “cheat,” and “traitor.” These are stark words to describe a season, revealing the frustration of the speaker who feels that the weather in June has somehow hindered, rather than helped, the war effort. The month, instead of being gentle, has turned into a symbol of harshness— “Wind, Hail, Gale, or Thunder, Cold or Cloud, or Sleet.” The speaker implies that June has become an enemy, aligning itself with the forces of nature that are, quite literally, working against the soldiers and the cause of freedom.
The rhetorical question “If there is any trick you’ve left undone / That helps the enemy, pray tell me one?” expresses the intensity of the speaker’s frustration, as if to say that everything about June’s weather has conspired to assist the enemy in their efforts. The poem takes on a tone of almost mockingly dramatic outrage, accusing June of more than just bad weather—it suggests the month has been an active participant in the enemy’s success.
Yet, even in its harsh condemnation, the poem ends with a twist of irony and reluctant admiration. The speaker admits that despite June’s failures, it remains a “winner all the way,” and in a sarcastic tone, gives it a “Star.” This is a peculiar mix of criticism and grudging acknowledgment that June, in its own way, has still played a significant role in the war, albeit one that the speaker believes was far from helpful. The final line—“History will croon: ‘How we Defied the Traitor, General June!’”—is particularly biting. It envisions June as a betrayer, but also recognizes that history will remember it, even if it’s for its failure.
The poem uses humor and hyperbole to create a commentary on the unpredictability and frustration of wartime conditions. While the speaker’s frustrations are clear, there is also an underlying acknowledgment of the complexity of the war effort, in which even a “traitor” like June can still play a role in the grand scheme of history. The imagery of June as both a “cheat” and “winner” reflects the harsh reality of wartime, where even the most unexpected forces—whether weather or human actions—can shape the outcome of a conflict.
In sum, this poem captures the mix of idealism and disappointment that often accompanies war. June could have been a month of ideal conditions for victory, but instead, it is portrayed as a traitor to the cause. Yet, the poem’s playful tone and ultimate irony suggest that, despite its perceived failures, the month—like the war itself—is something that will remain remembered in history. It’s a reminder of how circumstances beyond human control, like weather, can shift the course of events and contribute to the broader narrative of war.