A.P. Herbert
Why should we tell the Hun
What happens when we’ve won?
You do not tell the snake
What form his death will take,
Or courteously explain
That he will feel no pain
(Unless you’re so polite
You’d like another bite,
Or think that you can make
Hard bargains with a snake).
You hit him on the head
Until the reptile’s dead.
When we are sure of that
It will be time to chat.
© by owner. provided at no charge for educational purposes
Analysis (AI Assisted)
This war poem captures a visceral, no-nonsense perspective on dealing with the enemy, using the metaphor of a snake to emphasize the brutality and pragmatism of war. The speaker expresses a sense of justified violence, underscoring that there is no room for politeness or negotiation when it comes to eliminating a threat.
The opening lines immediately set a tone of defiance and suspicion: “Why should we tell the Hun / What happens when we’ve won?” The speaker rejects the idea of explaining or justifying the consequences of victory to the enemy, suggesting that such considerations are irrelevant and perhaps even naive. This stance is reinforced by the metaphor of the snake, a symbol of danger and deceit, which works to dehumanize the enemy. In this view, the Germans—referred to as “the Hun,” a derogatory term historically used to describe German soldiers—are portrayed not as adversaries to be reasoned with, but as a malevolent force to be crushed.
The speaker continues by stating that just as one doesn’t explain to a snake how it will die, there is no obligation to be diplomatic or polite with an enemy who has inflicted harm. The line, “You hit him on the head / Until the reptile’s dead,” conveys a brutal, final solution to the problem, with no room for hesitation or mercy. The implication is that once the threat is certain and understood, any attempts at negotiation are futile, even dangerous. This view of war is stark and utilitarian—eliminate the enemy decisively and quickly, with no moral or ethical considerations holding one back.
The poem’s structure itself mirrors the simplicity and directness of the speaker’s argument. The consistent rhythm and rhyme scheme make the poem feel almost nursery-like, which may be intended to underline the cold, detached attitude toward violence. There’s no room for nuance here—just a clear-cut solution to a problem that demands action.
The closing lines hint at the possibility of reconciliation or communication “when we are sure of that / It will be time to chat,” but this comes only after the enemy has been neutralized. The suggestion that discussions might follow only after victory is secured reinforces the poem’s central theme: there is no place for dialogue or mercy during a fight for survival, only action. The absence of empathy for the enemy further emphasizes the callousness of the situation.
This poem is unapologetically harsh in its portrayal of wartime mentality, suggesting that victory and survival come first, while any human decency or diplomacy should be deferred until the threat is eliminated. Through the snake metaphor, the speaker argues that sometimes the most effective response to a dangerous force is not to negotiate, but to strike decisively and without hesitation. This reflects a hard-edged view of war, one that is more concerned with pragmatic outcomes than with the moral or emotional weight of the violence involved.