A.P. Herbert
The blimp (if he exists) may say
‘This thing is new. Take it away.’
But is the Wimp’s a wiser song—
‘This thing is old. It must be wrong.’
© by owner. provided at no charge for educational purposes
Analysis (AI Assisted)
This brief but thought-provoking poem contrasts two types of thinking in response to new technology or ideas: the cautious, skeptical approach of the “Wimp” and the bold, progressive stance of the “Blimp.” While both characters represent different attitudes towards change, the poem subtly critiques the way each reacts to innovation.
The first character, the “blimp,” might be seen as a symbol of cautious optimism. The blimp, being “new,” is willing to embrace innovation (“This thing is new. Take it away”) but is also capable of rejecting it when it doesn’t meet its standards or expectations. The blimp’s perspective, while open to progress, still retains some degree of discretion—it is not blinded by novelty but recognizes that innovation must serve a clear purpose. The phrase “Take it away” hints at the idea that not every new thing is necessarily an improvement or a solution, and that there is a need for discernment even when something is labeled “new.”
On the other hand, the “Wimp” is a representation of the more conservative, fearful response to change, with an almost reflexive rejection of anything unfamiliar. The Wimp’s response—”This thing is old. It must be wrong”—is a declaration that anything unfamiliar, perhaps even anything challenging, must be disregarded because it conflicts with established norms. This line reveals a resistance to new ideas not based on evaluation or reason but on the assumption that the old way is always better or safer. The Wimp, by positioning himself against change because of its novelty, dismisses the potential value of innovation before truly understanding it.
The juxtaposition of the two characters reveals the tension between those who are too eager to adopt the new without question (the Blimp) and those who automatically reject it because it is perceived as unfamiliar or old-fashioned (the Wimp). The poem critiques both attitudes, showing how each has its limitations. The Blimp’s attitude is open to change but may be prone to blindly following the next trend, while the Wimp’s reflexive conservatism could stifle progress.
Ultimately, the poem raises questions about how we deal with change. Are we overly eager to embrace what’s new without fully understanding it? Or do we dismiss it outright out of fear or habit? The poem suggests that neither response is ideal and calls for a more nuanced, thoughtful approach to new ideas—one that weighs both the value of the old and the potential of the new.