Carrie Clifford
Nay, keep the sword which once we gave,
A token of our trust in thee;
The steel is true, the blade is keen–
False as thou art it cannot be.
We hailed thee as our glorious chief,
With laurel-wreaths we bound thy brow;
Thy name then thrilled from tongue to tongue:
In whispers hushed we breathe it now.
Yes, keep it till thy dying day;
Momentous ever let it be,
Of a great treasure once possessed–
A people’s love now lost to thee.
Thy mother will not bow her head;
She bares her bosom to thee now;
But may the bright steel fail to wound–
It is more merciful than thou.
And ere thou strik’st the fatal blow,
Thousands of sons of this fair land
Will rise, and, in their anger just,
Will stay the rash act of thy hand.
And when in terror thou shalt hear
Thy murderous deeds of vengeance cry
And feel the weight of thy great crime,
Then fall upon thy sword and die.
Those aged locks I’ll not reproach,
Although upon a traitor’s brow;
We’ve looked with reverence on them once,
We’ll try and not revile them now.
But her true sons and daughters pray,
That ere thy day of reckoning be,
Thy ingrate heart may feel the pain
To know thy mother once more free.
© by owner. provided at no charge for educational purposes
You may find this and other poems here.
Analysis (AI Assisted)
This poem continues the pattern of Southern wartime writing that turns personal disappointment into a public accusation. It is another piece aimed at Winfield Scott, but the style here is colder and more resigned than some of the louder attacks written at the same time. Instead of dramatic outbursts or grand comparisons, the poem focuses on the idea of a broken bond. Every stanza turns the emotional distance between Scott and the South into something visible, especially through the repeated use of the sword as a symbol of trust. The poem keeps circling back to that symbol because it gives the accusation a physical anchor: the South gave something meaningful, Scott misused it, and the poet now wants that object to sit with him as a reminder of what he supposedly betrayed.
The poem’s tone mixes quiet grief with sharp hostility. The speaker refuses to call Scott names outright, but the criticism sits under every line. This approach makes the anger feel more controlled, but not less severe. For example, the poem imagines Scott’s mother unable to wound him with the blade, but it leaves no doubt that the South considers his actions more harmful than any weapon. This method of comparing moral betrayal to physical violence shows up in several places, and the poem uses it to establish a sense of irreversible damage.
Structurally, the poem builds from disappointment to a kind of fatal warning. It starts by allowing Scott to keep the sword, then moves toward a prediction that his actions will provoke an uprising, and ends with the idea that he will eventually fall on the sword himself. There is no subtlety in these steps, but they give the poem a clear progression from accusation to imagined punishment. The imagery of aged locks and motherly sorrow tries to frame the South as the wronged parent, while Scott becomes the ungrateful child. That framing is meant to appeal to shared cultural values about loyalty and filial duty, turning political allegiance into something almost domestic.
As a war poem, the piece reflects the way the Civil War turned commanders into symbols. Scott is less a real man here than a stand-in for the frustration toward anyone from the South who stayed with the Union. This poem uses him to express a collective sense of injury and disbelief. The emotional weight comes not from the historical facts but from the feeling that a household figure has abandoned his own people. The poem is not interested in nuance or context; its goal is to reinforce the emotional boundaries of the conflict and to cast the break as final.
Taken as part of wartime rhetoric, this poem shows how quickly the language of family, honor, and loyalty became weaponized during the early stages of the war. It is a record of sentiment rather than strategy, and it gives insight into how people used poetry to define the moral terms of the conflict for themselves.