Jessie Pope
When Blucher helped us make an end
Of Bonaparte, the common foe,
He came to England as a friend,
About a hundred years ago.
The sight of London fired his breast,
He gazed with eagerness and wonder,
And, brimming with Teutonic zest,
He cried, “Oh, what a town to plunder! “
Der Tag, however, was not yet.
A century has passed away.
Blucher has settled Nature’s debt,
But his example lives to-day
And kindles in the German mind
An altar that there’s no uprooting,
Where love of power is enshrined,
Together with a love of looting.
They spoil and pillage, smash and swill ;
And helpless cities they have racked
Must, willy nilly, pay the bill
For the delight of being sacked,
That motto “Blood and Iron” is done ;
A newer one must be enscrolled ;
The carte de visite of the Hun
Should now be printed, ” Blood and Gold.”
© by owner. provided at no charge for educational purposes
Analysis (AI Assisted)
This poem takes on a sharp, satirical tone as it traces a connection between historical events and the destructive nature of German militarism, linking Blucher’s 1815 visit to London to the aggression seen in the First World War. It uses the past to cast a critical eye on the present, showing how an attitude of conquest and plunder has continued to shape the actions of the Germans over a century.
The opening lines introduce Blucher, the Prussian general who played a pivotal role in the defeat of Napoleon at the Battle of Waterloo. The poem recounts his famous visit to London after the victory, where his reaction to the city is described in a surprising way. Rather than expressing admiration for the city as a symbol of British resilience, Blucher is depicted as immediately thinking of it as a “town to plunder.” This is a clever commentary on the mindset of conquest, suggesting that, for Blucher, even a victorious peace was tinged with the desire for spoils and power.
The poem then leaps forward in time, noting that while Blucher’s century has passed, the spirit of his words lives on in the German mentality. The idea that “love of power” and “love of looting” are enshrined in the German mind presents a rather cynical view of German ambition, implying that conquest and domination have become ingrained cultural values. The imagery of an “altar” that cannot be uprooted suggests that this mindset is not just political but deeply cultural, something embedded in the national identity and passed down through generations.
The second half of the poem shifts to directly critique the more recent German militarism seen during World War I. “They spoil and pillage, smash and swill” describes the havoc wrought by German forces, using harsh, visceral language that evokes destruction without mercy. The mention of “helpless cities” that “must, willy nilly, pay the bill” underscores the poem’s sense of injustice—cities are left to bear the brunt of destruction that was imposed upon them. The use of “pay the bill” seems to imply that these cities are not just the victims of war but are being forced to bear the financial and emotional costs of it as well.
The final stanza introduces a biting critique of the German motto of “Blood and Iron,” associated with Otto von Bismarck’s policy of unification through war. The poem suggests that this slogan is outdated, and proposes that the new motto of Germany should be “Blood and Gold,” replacing the old rhetoric of military power with a more materialistic, imperialistic one that centers on conquest for wealth and resources. This shift from “Blood and Iron” to “Blood and Gold” reflects the increasingly imperial and economic motivations behind German aggression, implying that the violence of war is now less about national unity and more about the pursuit of economic gain through conquest.
The poem uses historical references and sharp irony to paint a picture of the German national psyche, suggesting that for over a century, there has been an unbroken line of militarism and a desire to plunder. It critiques the attitudes of power and conquest that were not only alive in Blucher’s time but are still evident in the broader picture of World War I. By doing so, the poem offers a scathing commentary on German aggression, equating it with a deep-seated, almost religious commitment to domination and plunder.
In summary, this poem is a critique of German militarism that spans centuries, using Blucher’s visit to London as a symbol for a deeper, ongoing desire for power and loot. Through historical reference, satirical tone, and biting imagery, it links past and present actions, suggesting that the spirit of conquest is still very much alive and driving the events of the time. The clever manipulation of historical context makes the poem both a commentary on the continuity of warlike tendencies in German nationalism and a critique of the devastating effects of such an ideology.