Joseph Lee
When first I saw you in the curious street
Like some platoon of soldier ghosts in grey,
My mad impulse was all to smite and slay,
To spit upon you–tread you ‘neath my feet.
But when I saw how each sad soul did greet
My gaze with no sign of defiant frown,
How from tired eyes looked spirits broken down,
How each face showed the pale flag of defeat,
And doubt, despair, and disillusionment,
And how were grievous wounds on many a head.
And on your garb red-faced was other red;
And how you stooped as men whose strength was spent,
I knew that we had suffered each as other,
And could have grasped your hand and cried, “My brother!”
© by owner. provided at no charge for educational purposes
Analysis (AI Assisted)
This poem explores the complex emotions stirred by encountering the enemy in the aftermath of war, capturing the tension between hatred, pity, and a shared sense of suffering. The speaker begins with intense hostility toward the “platoon of soldier ghosts in grey,” immediately associating the enemy with an almost spectral, haunting presence. The impulse to “smite and slay” suggests a deeply ingrained animosity, likely driven by the brutal reality of war and its dehumanizing effects on both soldiers and civilians. The speaker’s initial reaction, filled with anger and violence, reflects the instinctive divide between “us” and “them”—the soldiers of opposing sides.
However, as the speaker observes the soldiers more closely, their demeanor shifts from hatred to empathy. “When I saw how each sad soul did greet / My gaze with no sign of defiant frown,” the speaker notices not the arrogance or challenge expected from an enemy, but a quiet resignation. The “sad soul” and “tired eyes” suggest that the soldiers are not proud victors, but rather broken men who have suffered just as much as the speaker and his comrades. The “spirits broken down” evoke a sense of weariness and defeat, not the fire of resistance. These lines convey the idea that the real enemy is not a group of faceless foes, but the shared misery of war that leaves all participants wounded, physically and emotionally.
The imagery of “grievous wounds” and “red-faced was other red” further emphasizes the physical toll war has taken on both sides. The “other red” on their garments likely refers to the bloodstains of battle, underscoring that, despite being on opposite sides, the soldiers share a common experience of violence and suffering. The soldiers are shown as exhausted and humbled, no longer carrying the weight of pride or nationalism, but simply the weight of their wounds—both literal and psychological.
As the poem progresses, the speaker’s emotional transformation becomes clear: “I knew that we had suffered each as other, / And could have grasped your hand and cried, ‘My brother!’” This conclusion is powerful because it suggests a recognition of the shared humanity between the speaker and his enemy. The notion of brotherhood, which might seem impossible in the heat of battle, becomes a real possibility in the wake of shared suffering. The enemy soldiers are no longer seen as faceless figures to be defeated, but as men who have endured the same horrors and pains. The speaker’s journey from violent impulse to compassion reflects the humanizing power of empathy, even in the most brutal circumstances.
Ultimately, this poem examines how war blurs the lines between enemy and comrade. It highlights the moment when hatred gives way to understanding, revealing that the true impact of war is not only the destruction it causes but the way it exposes the shared vulnerabilities of those involved. In the face of death, suffering, and despair, the speaker realizes that the “enemy” is not so different after all, and that the bond of shared human experience is stronger than the division of battle.