Leslie Coulson
So be it, God, I take what Thou dost give,
And gladly give what Thou dost take away.
For me Thy choice is barren days and grey.
Unquestioning Thy ordered days I live,
I do not seek to sift in Reason’s sieve –
Thou rangest far beyond our Reason’s sway.
We are but poor, uncomprehending clay,
For Thou to mould as Thou dost well conceive.
But when my blanched days of sorrow end,
And this poor clay for funeral is drest,
Then shall my soul to Thy Gold Gate ascend,
Then shall my soul soar up and summon Thee
To tell me why. And as Thou answerest,
So shall I judge Thee, God, not Thou judge me.
© by owner. provided at no charge for educational purposes
Analysis (AI Assisted)
This poem captures a deep, personal struggle with faith and suffering, set within the context of the speaker’s relationship with God. The speaker’s words are a mixture of resignation, obedience, and, finally, a demand for understanding. The poem explores themes of divine will, human suffering, and the limitations of human reason. The central tension in the poem lies in the speaker’s acceptance of God’s will in life, but also in the speaker’s desire for an explanation when that life ends.
The poem opens with an acceptance of God’s plan, articulated through the lines, *”So be it, God, I take what Thou dost give, / And gladly give what Thou dost take away.”* There is an initial sense of surrender here, as the speaker seems to acknowledge that whatever life offers, whether it be joy or sorrow, comes from God. The speaker doesn’t question or resist, instead accepting both the “barren days and grey” that life may present. The phrase “barren days and grey” suggests a life filled with hardship or monotony, perhaps even despair. Yet the speaker takes this all in stride, without argument or complaint, indicating a form of quiet obedience, even if tinged with melancholy.
However, this resignation is not one of passive acceptance. The speaker, while acknowledging the limits of human understanding — “We are but poor, uncomprehending clay” — also recognizes that human beings do not possess the full range of comprehension necessary to understand the reasons behind divine will. The metaphor of “uncomprehending clay” evokes the Biblical image of God as the potter, shaping humanity as He sees fit. The speaker seems to accept that, as “clay,” humans cannot expect to understand the fullness of God’s reasons or purposes. This submission to the divine order appears sincere and humble, as the speaker submits to God’s greater wisdom and power, even though they do not fully understand it.
The next shift in tone comes toward the end of the poem, where the speaker reveals a subtle tension in their faith. After death, when the speaker’s life is over, and their “blanched days of sorrow end,” they express a longing for answers: *”Then shall my soul soar up and summon Thee / To tell me why.”* The speaker here hints at a future confrontation with God, where they intend to demand an explanation for the suffering they’ve endured. The notion that the speaker would “summon” God suggests a boldness that contrasts with the earlier submissive tone. There is a clear shift from passive acceptance to an active desire for clarity — a wish not only for answers but for the ability to judge God in return. The line *”So shall I judge Thee, God, not Thou judge me”* is startling and subversive, as it overturns the traditional hierarchical relationship between humanity and the divine. In this moment, the speaker, having endured the hardships of life, feels empowered to judge God’s actions, a sharp break from the earlier deference.
This final claim — that the speaker will “judge” God — challenges traditional religious ideas about the divine and human humility. The speaker moves from unquestioning submission to the bold assertion of their right to challenge God. This tension between surrender and rebellion runs throughout the poem. On one hand, the speaker accepts God’s will, even in the face of hardship, but on the other, they demand an explanation and, ultimately, the right to assess the fairness of divine actions. The poem suggests that faith is not a simple, unquestioning submission but an active, complex relationship filled with both acceptance and resistance.
There is also an implicit theme in the poem of the human desire for meaning and justice. The speaker’s willingness to “summon” God and demand an explanation for their suffering reflects a deep human need to understand why suffering exists and whether it has any purpose. The speaker appears to seek a kind of closure — not just in the afterlife but in the knowledge that their suffering was not in vain, that God’s decisions could be justified. The final lines, with their audacious declaration of human judgment, reflect the tension many people feel when they experience suffering without clear answers: the urge to understand, to find meaning, and to demand that the suffering have a purpose.
In terms of structure, the poem follows a traditional form that mirrors its theological and philosophical content. The use of rhyme and meter provides a sense of order and control, which contrasts with the chaotic emotions expressed within. The formal structure also mirrors the traditional concept of divine order, suggesting that even in moments of questioning or rebellion, there is an underlying structure that the speaker ultimately accepts, even if begrudgingly. This formal structure is disrupted only in the final lines, where the speaker’s bold assertion stands in stark contrast to the restraint shown in the earlier parts of the poem. This break from tradition mirrors the speaker’s own spiritual conflict — an internal struggle between submission and a desire for justice.
In conclusion, the poem is a reflection on faith, suffering, and the search for meaning. The speaker’s complex relationship with God is one of both surrender and rebellion, acceptance and challenge. While they begin by accepting divine will without question, by the end, the speaker demands an explanation for their suffering and asserts their right to judge God. This tension between faith and questioning captures a universal experience, especially in the face of life’s hardships. The poem ultimately suggests that the journey of faith is not a static, unquestioning acceptance of divine will but a dynamic and sometimes conflicted process that involves both trust and a desire for understanding.