Claude Templer
Tempest of iron prepared the advance of a host ‘gainst a remnant;
Tempest of shouting announced the advance of that host overwhelming,
And as the black rocks o’erwhelmed but unvanquished make stand ‘gainst the ocean,
So did that glorious remnant make stand ‘gainst that host overwhelming,
Till the war pride and war lust of that host like the rage of the ocean,
Broke and recoiled from the wall of their stubborn unyielding resistance.
How many times, say, when you were a host strong and we were a remnant,
When you had guns by the thousand and we had to make war without them,
How many times did you come in your thousands to conquer that salient,
Only to find there the spirit of Agincourt like a flame storm fanned
Burning unquenched in the hearts and the souls of that unvanquished army.
Did ye not know in the heart of your hearts when your orders were issued,
When you advanced in the pride ofyour war lust and glittering harness,
Did ye not know that the men of that little contemptible army
Come of that race that are known as the stubbornest fighters the world through?
Surely ye knew in the heart of your hearts when your orders were issued,
When you were told to go right through to Ypres or to die in the failure,
That you were never the match of that little contemptible army?
© by owner. provided at no charge for educational purposes
You may find this and other poems here.
Analysis (AI Assisted)
This war poem speaks to the resilience and defiance of a small, outnumbered force against a larger, seemingly unstoppable enemy. The poem evokes a sense of fierce pride and determination in the face of overwhelming odds, portraying the soldiers as embodying the spirit of past victories and legendary warriors. It reflects on the emotional and psychological aspects of battle, especially the power dynamics between the two opposing forces and the unyielding strength of the “remnant” in the face of destruction.
The poem begins by describing the “tempest of iron” that precedes the advance of the attacking host. This imagery of a violent, unrelenting storm sets the tone for the battle to come. The “tempest of shouting” that accompanies the advance signals the chaos and noise of war, creating a sense of urgency and inevitability. The contrast between the overwhelming power of the attacking forces and the “remnant” that stands in their way is stark. The “remnant” is portrayed as unvanquished and steadfast, much like black rocks standing against the ocean’s relentless waves. This metaphor captures the strength of the defending soldiers, who hold their ground despite the overwhelming power of the enemy.
The central theme of the poem is the tenacity of the “remnant,” which symbolizes a group of soldiers, perhaps one of a smaller or less equipped army, standing firm against a much larger force. The comparison to the battle of Agincourt — a historical example of a small force defeating a much larger one — is significant. The speaker suggests that the spirit of Agincourt, a legendary victory in which the underdog French forces triumphed, lives on in these soldiers. This idea of an unquenchable, almost spiritual resistance is reinforced as the soldiers of the “remnant” are described as having a burning “spirit” that drives them to continue fighting.
The poem questions the attacking forces’ belief in their own superiority. The speaker asks if the larger army, with its thousands of guns, knew deep down that they were facing a force that could not be easily defeated. The repeated question — “Did ye not know?” — conveys a sense of confidence and defiance, suggesting that the attacking force underestimated the will of those they sought to conquer. This highlights the idea that war is not just about numbers and weapons, but about the will and spirit of the soldiers involved.
The repetition of the phrase “the heart of your hearts” emphasizes the emotional and psychological awareness that the attackers have of their own limitations. The “little contemptible army” — a phrase that might refer to the soldiers’ perception of themselves as underdogs — becomes a symbol of resilience, a force to be reckoned with despite its size and the apparent disadvantages. The attacking force, with all its military might, is presented as arrogant and overly confident, driven by “war lust” and pride. However, these qualities are ultimately shown to be futile against the steadfastness and determination of the “remnant.”
The poem also alludes to the broader historical context of the First World War, particularly the Battle of Ypres. The reference to Ypres, a significant and brutal battle during the war, grounds the poem in the realities of the conflict. However, the focus is less on the specific details of the battle and more on the psychological and emotional aspects of warfare. The “remnant” is portrayed as an embodiment of the unyielding human spirit, while the attacking host represents the futile aggression of war.
The speaker’s pride in the “little contemptible army” is evident, and this pride is not based on the number of men or the size of their arsenal, but on their will to fight and their ability to resist. This poem highlights the importance of morale and determination in war, suggesting that the heart and spirit of the soldiers can make all the difference, even when the odds seem insurmountable. The line “the men of that little contemptible army / Come of that race that are known as the stubbornest fighters the world through” speaks to the idea that the soldiers’ heritage and their inherent qualities make them formidable opponents, regardless of their limited resources.
In the final lines, the speaker asks the enemy if they knew, in their hearts, that they were never truly a match for this “little contemptible army.” This question serves as both a taunt and a statement of defiance. It implies that the attackers, despite their superiority in numbers and equipment, could never truly defeat the unyielding spirit of the defenders. The poem ends on a note of triumphant resistance, as the “remnant” proves that their determination is more powerful than any military might.
Overall, the poem explores themes of resilience, defiance, and the power of the human spirit in the face of overwhelming odds. It underscores the importance of morale and conviction in warfare, showing that the true strength of a soldier lies not in their weapons, but in their determination to stand firm against the enemy. The poem also critiques the arrogance and blind aggression of the larger, more powerful force, suggesting that their downfall is inevitable due to their underestimation of the “remnant.” Through vivid imagery and historical references, the poem captures the emotional and psychological realities of war, emphasizing the enduring strength of those who fight not just for victory, but for the pride and spirit of their cause.