Edward Thomas
As the team’s head-brass flashed out on the turn
The lovers disappeared into the wood.
I sat among the boughs of the fallen elm
That strewed the angle of the fallow, and
Watched the plough narrowing a yellow square
Of charlock. Every time the horses turned
Instead of treading me down, the ploughman leaned
Upon the handles to say or ask a word,
About the weather, next about the war.
Scraping the share he faced towards the wood,
And screwed along the furrow till the brass flashed
Once more.
The blizzard felled the elm whose crest
I sat in, by a woodpecker’s round hole,
The ploughman said. ‘When will they take it away?’
‘When the war’s over.’ So the talk began –
One minute and an interval of ten,
A minute more and the same interval.
‘Have you been out?’ ‘No.’ ‘And don’t want to, perhaps?’
‘If I could only come back again, I should.
I could spare an arm, I shouldn’t want to lose
A leg. If I should lose my head, why, so,
I should want nothing more…Have many gone
From here?’ ‘Yes.’ ‘Many lost?’ ‘Yes, a good few.
Only two teams work on the farm this year.
One of my mates is dead. The second day
In France they killed him. It was back in March,
The very night of the blizzard, too. Now if
He had stayed here we should have moved the tree.’
‘And I should not have sat here. Everything
Would have been different. For it would have been
Another world.’ ‘Ay, and a better, though
If we could see all all might seem good.’ Then
The lovers came out of the wood again:
The horses started and for the last time
I watched the clods crumble and topple over
After the ploughshare and the stumbling team.
© by owner. provided at no charge for educational purposes
You may find this and other poems here.
Analysis (AI Assisted)
This poem paints a quiet yet deeply moving scene, blending the rhythms of rural life with the shadow of war. The setting—a ploughman working a field, a fallen elm, and a casual observer—is deceptively simple. Beneath it, though, lies a layered exploration of how war touches even the most seemingly peaceful corners of life.
The interaction between the narrator and the ploughman is the heart of the poem. Their conversation is sparse and interrupted, mirroring the slow, repetitive work of ploughing. There’s a certain stoicism in how the ploughman speaks, whether about the blizzard that felled the elm, the men lost to war, or his own musings on what he’d be willing to sacrifice if he went to fight. His tone is practical, yet the weight of his words lingers. “If I should lose my head, why, so, / I should want nothing more” is delivered with startling nonchalance, but it’s a grim acknowledgment of war’s brutal finality.
The fallen elm becomes a central image, linking the natural world to the human one. Its presence is a reminder of both destruction and persistence. The tree fell in a storm, much like men fall in war, but it remains part of the landscape, just as memories of those lost linger. The ploughman’s observation—“When the war’s over”—about removing the tree ties the elm’s fate to the larger disruption caused by the conflict. It’s a quiet reminder that the war doesn’t just take lives; it leaves things undone, suspends ordinary life, and shifts priorities.
The contrast between the lovers disappearing into the woods and the ploughman’s conversation about death and loss adds another layer. The lovers represent continuity and hope, or at least a brief escape from the grim realities the ploughman describes. Their reappearance at the end subtly reinforces the idea that life goes on, even as the soil is turned and clods crumble under the weight of history.
What stands out most is how the poem captures the way war filters into everything, even a remote farm field. The ploughman doesn’t romanticize or dramatize his experiences; his reflections are grounded in practical concerns. Who will move the fallen tree? How many teams are left to work the land? These everyday details carry a heavy emotional charge, showing how the war reshapes not just lives but landscapes and routines.
The poem doesn’t offer solutions or grand declarations. Instead, it focuses on quiet moments and small exchanges that reveal much about the human condition. The ploughman’s casual comment, “If we could see all all might seem good,” hints at the complexity of perspective—how life and death, destruction and continuity, can coexist in ways that might defy understanding.
In the end, the poem leaves us with the image of the ploughshare cutting through the earth, a symbol of labor and endurance. It’s a quiet yet profound reminder that even in the face of upheaval, the routines of life persist, and with them, the small, meaningful connections between people and the land they inhabit.