Emily J. Moore
While in the first ward of the Quintard Hospital, Rome, Georgia, a young
soldier from the Eighth Arkansas Begiment, who had been wounded at
Murfreesboro’, called me to his bedside. As I approached I saw that he was
dying, and when I bent over him he was just able to whisper, “Tell the
boys the war is ended.”
“Tell the boys the war is ended,”
These were all the words he said;
“Tell the boys the war is ended,”
In an instant more was dead.
Strangely bright, serene, and cheerful
Was the smile upon his face,
While the pain, of late so fearful,
Had not left the slightest trace.
“Tell the boys the war is ended,”
And with heavenly visions bright
Thoughts of comrades loved were blended,
As his spirit took its flight.
“Tell the boys the war is ended,”
“Grant, 0 God, it may be so,”
Was the prayer which then ascended,
In a whisper deep, though low.
“Tell the boys the war is ended,”
And his warfare then was o’er,
As, by angel bands attended,
He departed from earth’s shore.
Bursting shells and cannons roaring
Could not rouse him by their din;
He to better worlds was soaring,
Far from war, and pain, and sin.
© by owner. provided at no charge for educational purposes
You may find this and other poems here.
Analysis (AI Assisted)
This poem is built around a single sentence spoken at the edge of death, and everything else exists to slow that moment down so the reader has to sit with it. The framing note matters because it fixes the poem in a specific place and time: a hospital ward in Rome, Georgia, after Murfreesboro. This is not a battlefield poem in the usual sense. The fighting has already happened elsewhere. What remains is its aftermath, carried into a quiet room where the war finishes its work on one young body.
The repeated line, “Tell the boys the war is ended,” does most of the heavy lifting. On the surface, it sounds hopeful, even mistaken, since the war clearly is not over. But the poem never treats the line as confusion or error. Instead, it allows two meanings to exist at once. For the war at large, the statement is a wish. For the soldier himself, it is fact. His war is finished. The repetition keeps shifting between those meanings, and that tension is where the poem lives.
The poem avoids describing the wound, the blood, or the physical damage. Instead, it focuses on the expression on his face and the calm that follows pain. This choice keeps the tone restrained and controlled. The smile, described as serene and free of suffering, fits squarely within nineteenth-century ideas of the “good death,” especially the soldier’s death. Pain is acknowledged, but only to say it has vanished. The body is already becoming less important than the message and the spirit leaving it behind.
Religion enters quietly but firmly. The prayer that the words might be true extends the soldier’s personal release into a wider hope for peace. Heaven is not described in detail, but angels, better worlds, and escape from pain and sin are all invoked. This spiritual framing softens the brutality of war without denying its cost. Cannons and bursting shells are still present, but they are powerless now. Their noise cannot reach him. That contrast reinforces the idea that death is both an end and a refuge.
The poem’s emotional pull comes from how little is said about the speaker or the narrator. The focus never shifts away from the dying soldier and his final request. The narrator becomes a messenger, tasked with carrying the words outward. That mirrors what the poem itself is doing: passing along a sentence meant for “the boys,” the comrades still alive and still fighting. The poem asks the reader to stand in that same position, holding a message that cannot yet be fulfilled.
There is also something quietly unsettling in how peaceful the ending is. The war is framed as loud, chaotic, and violent, but death brings silence and order. That contrast risks making death seem like a solution rather than a tragedy. The poem does not question that idea; it accepts it. In doing so, it reflects a common way war poetry of the period tried to make sense of overwhelming loss by turning it into spiritual closure.
As a war poem, this piece is less about conflict and more about meaning. It does not argue for strategy, victory, or blame. It records a moment where hope, exhaustion, faith, and resignation collapse into a single line. The simplicity of the language reinforces that effect. Nothing distracts from the sentence the soldier leaves behind. By the end, the reader understands that the war is not ended at all, yet the poem insists that this small, human ending still matters. That quiet insistence is what gives the poem its weight.