Ivor Gurney
Who died on the wires, and hung there, one of two –
Who for his hours of life had chattered through
Infinite lovely chatter of Bucks accent:
Yet faced unbroken wires; stepped over, and went
A noble fool, faithful to his stripes – and ended.
But I weak, hungry, and willing only for the chance
Of line- to fight in the line, lay down under unbroken
Wires, and saw the flashes and kept unshaken,
Till the politest voice – a finicking accent, said:
‘Do you think you might crawl through there: there’s a hole.’
Darkness shot at: I smiled, as politely replied –
‘I’m afraid not, Sir.’ There was no hole, no way to be seen
Nothing but chance of death, after tearing of clothes.
Kept flat, and watched the darkness, hearing bullets whizzing –
And thought of music – and swore deep heart’s oaths
(Polite to God) and retreated and came on again,
Again retreated a second time, faced the screen.
© by owner. provided at no charge for educational purposes
Analysis (AI Assisted)
This war poem takes us into a moment of quiet, inner conflict and fear, where courage and hesitation intertwine, and the stark realities of battle are filtered through the lens of individual experience. The poet reflects on the contrast between the idealized notion of a noble soldier—a man who faces death for honor—and the lived reality of survival instinct, self-doubt, and the instinctive desire to avoid death.
At the poem’s opening, the speaker describes a fellow soldier, who “died on the wires,” an image that speaks to the brutal, often futile sacrifices made in war. The “one of two” who dies on the wire becomes a symbol of blind bravery, a soldier who, in his loyalty to his comrades and the cause, steps forward into certain death. This man is described as a “noble fool,” someone whose death is framed by a sense of misplaced honor—a tragic yet familiar theme in war poetry.
The speaker contrasts this heroic image with his own experience. He does not step forward as boldly as the other soldier but instead “weak, hungry, and willing only for the chance / Of line.” His struggle is not one of nobility but survival. The speaker is in a moment of intense fear and hesitation, unwilling to take the same kind of reckless risks. He describes how, when faced with the decision to crawl through the wire, he politely but firmly refuses. There’s an interesting tension here: the speaker is not depicted as a coward but as someone who is deeply aware of the cost of life and death. His refusal is not out of fear but an acute sense of self-preservation.
The line “I smiled, as politely replied – ‘I’m afraid not, Sir.’” adds a layer of irony to the poem. The speaker’s polite response, in the face of such dire circumstances, emphasizes the absurdity of war—where decorum and politeness are preserved even in the midst of imminent death. This moment encapsulates the internal struggle many soldiers face—how to reconcile their human instinct for survival with the outward demands of bravery and duty.
The poet’s description of the moment when bullets fly around him is visceral and intense: “watched the darkness, hearing bullets whizzing.” The sense of terror is palpable, yet there’s also a sense of resignation, a quiet acceptance of the chaotic and uncontrollable forces of war. The speaker contemplates music, a sharp contrast to the violence surrounding him, symbolizing a longing for escape or peace amidst the chaos. The mention of swearing “deep heart’s oaths / (Polite to God)” adds another layer of irony, where the speaker’s prayers seem to be as much about asking for mercy as they are about an attempt to maintain some sense of dignity, even when faced with death.
Finally, the poem ends on a note of cyclical action—”retreating and came on again”—as if the soldier is trapped in an endless loop of fear, action, and retreat. This repetition serves to emphasize the futility and exhaustion of war, the way in which soldiers are constantly thrown into situations where their bravery is tested, only for them to retreat, reflect, and return to the same dilemma. The “screen” here can be interpreted as the barrier between life and death, the seemingly impenetrable force that soldiers must face daily.
In many ways, this poem is a meditation on the tension between idealized heroism and the raw, often contradictory emotions soldiers experience in war. The image of the “noble fool” who faces death without hesitation is sharply contrasted with the speaker’s more introspective and cautious response. This contrast makes the poem feel deeply personal and human, allowing us to see the conflict of bravery, fear, and survival from an intimate perspective. The poet uses the language of politeness, routine, and even the mundane (like “chattering through / Infinite lovely chatter of Bucks accent”) to create a stark contrast with the violence and death that surrounds the soldiers, further deepening the absurdity and tragedy of war.
What stands out most in the poem is the way it captures the internal, often unspoken struggles that come with facing death in battle. The poet doesn’t romanticize the soldier’s experience, nor does he vilify it. Instead, he paints a complex portrait of a soldier trying to navigate the madness of war while holding on to a shred of politeness, survival instinct, and humanity. The poem asks the reader to question what it means to be a hero and what it means to simply survive, blurring the lines between the two in a way that resonates with the chaotic and contradictory nature of war itself.