Robert W. Service
Sez I: My Country calls? Well, let it call.
I grins perlitely and declines wiv thanks.
Go, let ’em plaster every blighted wall,
‘Ere’s ONE they don’t stampede into the ranks.
Them politicians with their greasy ways;
Them empire-grabbers — fight for ’em? No fear!
I’ve seen this mess a-comin’ from the days
Of Algyserious and Aggydear:
I’ve felt me passion rise and swell,
But . . . wot the ‘ell, Bill? Wot the ‘ell?
Sez I: My Country? Mine? I likes their cheek.
Me mud-bespattered by the cars they drive,
Wot makes my measly thirty bob a week,
And sweats red blood to keep meself alive!
Fight for the right to slave that they may spend,
Them in their mansions, me ‘ere in my slum?
No, let ’em fight wot’s something to defend:
But me, I’ve nothin’ — let the Kaiser come.
And so I cusses ‘ard and well,
But . . . wot the ‘ell, Bill? Wot the ‘ell?
Sez I: If they would do the decent thing,
And shield the missis and the little ‘uns,
Why, even I might shout “God save the King”,
And face the chances of them ‘ungry guns.
But we’ve got three, another on the way;
It’s that wot makes me snarl and set me jor:
The wife and nippers, wot of ’em, I say,
If I gets knocked out in this blasted war?
Gets proper busted by a shell,
But . . . wot the ‘ell, Bill? Wot the ‘ell?
Ay, wot the ‘ell’s the use of all this talk?
To-day some boys in blue was passin’ me,
And some of ’em they ‘ad no legs to walk,
And some of ’em they ‘ad no eyes to see.
And — well, I couldn’t look ’em in the face,
And so I’m goin’, goin’ to declare
I’m under forty-one and take me place
To face the music with the bunch out there.
A fool, you say! Maybe you’re right.
I’ll ‘ave no peace unless I fight.
I’ve ceased to think; I only know
I’ve gotta go, Bill, gotta go.
© by owner. provided at no charge for educational purposes
You may find this and other poems here.
Analysis (AI Assisted)
This poem speaks to the inner conflict and reluctant acceptance of a working-class man who is drawn into war, despite his doubts, grievances, and initial rejection. The tone is informal, even conversational, filled with slang, and the structure is casual yet persistent. The speaker, addressing a companion named Bill, begins with a clear resistance to joining the fight. He questions the reasons for war, pointing out the injustices and inequality that make him feel disconnected from the patriotic cause. Yet, by the end of the poem, he has resigned himself to his duty, driven by an overpowering sense of inevitability.
At the outset, the speaker rejects his “country’s call” with a defiant stance: *”Sez I: My Country calls? Well, let it call. / I grins perlitely and declines wiv thanks.”* His refusal isn’t born of cowardice, but of deep cynicism and a sense of betrayal. He resents the politicians and “empire-grabbers” who, in his view, are sending him off to fight wars that have little to do with him or his life. The reference to “Algyserious and Aggydear” likely nods to Alfred, Lord Tennyson’s “Charge of the Light Brigade” (with the British officer “Algy” representing the well-off class), mocking the lofty ideals that fuel wars fought by the working-class poor for those who will never see the front lines. The speaker’s frustration is palpable as he contemplates the vast chasm between the rich and the common man, and how little he has to fight for.
The second stanza deepens this resentment as the speaker reveals the economic disparity he faces. He struggles to make ends meet on a meager wage while the wealthy live in comfort. The bitterness toward the aristocracy and ruling class comes through sharply in his words: *”Fight for the right to slave that they may spend, / Them in their mansions, me ‘ere in my slum?”* There’s a growing sense of disillusionment with the notion of fighting for a cause that seems to only benefit the wealthy. His sarcastic dismissal of his country’s demands is a clear rejection of the idea that he should risk his life for a system that has done little for him.
The third stanza introduces a personal and familial aspect to the speaker’s objections. His concern is not just for himself, but for his wife and children: *”But we’ve got three, another on the way; / It’s that wot makes me snarl and set me jor.”* His fear of leaving his family behind — of not knowing whether he’ll survive to see them again — adds a heavy emotional layer to his skepticism. Yet even here, in the face of this vulnerability, the refrain *”But . . . wot the ‘ell, Bill? Wot the ‘ell?”* shows a resigned acceptance of the absurdity and hopelessness of the situation. The repeated question becomes an almost rhetorical shrug in the face of unchangeable circumstances, suggesting that, despite his reservations, he feels pressured to go.
The final stanza marks a shift in the speaker’s perspective. A moment of clarity strikes when he sees wounded soldiers, some without legs, some without eyes — the haunting aftermath of war. This brings his internal struggle to a head. His earlier cynicism gives way to a begrudging acknowledgment of the greater reality around him. *”And well, I couldn’t look ’em in the face”* indicates the speaker’s deep discomfort and sense of guilt, even as he tries to justify his earlier reluctance. The encounter with these men forces him to confront the reality of what war truly means: not the grand ideals of patriotism, but the raw, brutal consequences. The final lines *”I’ve ceased to think; I only know / I’ve gotta go, Bill, gotta go”* show the speaker’s surrender to a fate he can no longer avoid. The humor and defiance in his earlier lines have given way to the resigned determination of a man who feels he has no other choice but to serve, even if he doesn’t fully understand why.
Overall, the poem is a striking commentary on the contradictions of war and the complex emotions of those who fight in it. It captures the reluctance, confusion, and ultimately, the resignation that many soldiers must have felt, particularly those from the working class. The use of informal language, slang, and the recurring refrain of “Wot the ‘ell, Bill?” creates an intimate, relatable tone, as if the speaker is confiding in a friend. The casual tone doesn’t diminish the seriousness of the underlying themes, but rather makes them more visceral and real. This poem doesn’t just describe a man’s reluctant decision to go to war; it gives voice to the silent frustration of those caught in the machinery of conflict, fighting not for glory or honor, but out of a sense of duty, obligation, or simply because they feel they have no other choice.