Unknown
“Rifleman, shoot me a fancy shot,
Straight at the heart of yon prowling vidette;
Ring me a ball on the glittering spot
That shines on his breast like an amulet.”
“Ah, captain! here goes for a fine-drawn bead;
There’s music around when my barrel’s in tune.”
Crack! went the rifle; the messenger sped,
And dead from his horse fell the ringing dragoon.
“Now, rifleman, steal through the bushes, and snatch
From your victim some trinket to handsel first blood:
A button, a loop, or that luminous patch
That gleams in the moon like a diamond stud.”
“Oh, captain! I staggered, and sank in my track,
When I gazed on the face of the fallen vidette;
For he looked so like you, as he lay on his back,
That my heart rose upon me, and masters me yet.
“But I snatched off the trinket–this locket of gold;
An inch from the centre my lead broke its way,
Scarce grazing the picture, so fair to behold,
Of a beautiful lady in bridal array.”
“Ha! rifleman! fling me the locket–’tis she!
My brother’s young bride; and the fallen dragoon.
Was her husband. Hush, soldier!–’twas heaven’s deer
We must bury him there, by the light of the moon.
“But hark! the far bugles their warning unite;
War is a virtue, and weakness a sin;
There’s a lurking and lopping around us to-night:
Load again, rifleman, keep your hand in!”
© by owner. provided at no charge for educational purposes
You may find this and other poems here.
Analysis (AI Assisted)
This poem builds its force through a short, sharp scene rather than through argument or reflection. It opens with confidence and routine: a captain orders a shot, the rifleman responds with skill, and the killing is treated as clean, even musical. The language of marksmanship dominates the first exchange. The rifle is “in tune,” the shot is a “fancy” one, and the target is reduced to a shining spot. War here looks like craft, almost like sport, where precision is admired and distance makes violence manageable.
That sense of control collapses as soon as the rifleman approaches the body. The poem slows down at this moment, and the tone shifts from pride to shock. The face of the dead man matters more than the act that killed him. Recognition breaks through the abstraction of battle. The soldier is no longer a vidette or a dragoon; he looks like the captain. That resemblance unsettles the shooter, not because of guilt in the abstract, but because it collapses the space between friend and enemy. The poem suggests that war depends on keeping that distance intact, and that once it fails, the emotional cost becomes unavoidable.
The locket sharpens this realization. It introduces domestic life into the battlefield in a very direct way. A beautiful bride, preserved in miniature, survives inches from the bullet that killed her husband. The near miss feels cruelly symbolic. The poem does not dwell on her grief, but the image is enough. War intrudes into marriage and family, not as a grand idea but as a small object pulled from a dead man’s chest.
The captain’s response adds another layer. His recognition that the dead man is connected to him by family turns the killing into a private wound. Yet his reaction is brief. He orders burial and immediately pivots back to duty. The phrase “war is a virtue, and weakness a sin” is blunt and telling. It sounds like a creed soldiers repeat to survive, not because it is true, but because it is necessary. The poem lets that line stand without endorsement, allowing the reader to feel its harshness.
What makes the ending effective is its refusal to offer closure. There is no moral lesson spelled out, no moment of reflection beyond a few hushed words. The bugles sound, danger remains, and the rifleman is told to load again. The machinery of war resumes almost immediately, swallowing the personal tragedy it just exposed.
Overall, the poem works by compressing a large truth into a small encounter. It shows how war trains people to act efficiently while leaving them vulnerable to sudden, piercing moments of recognition. Skill, obedience, and resolve are necessary to survive, but they do not prevent grief or irony. The poem does not argue against war directly. Instead, it shows how easily war turns intimate connections into accidental targets, and how quickly those realizations are pushed aside so the fighting can continue.