Robert W. Service
I’ve been sittin’ starin’, starin’ at ‘is muddy pair of boots,
And tryin’ to convince meself it’s ‘im.
(Look out there, lad! That sniper — ‘e’s a dysey when ‘e shoots;
‘E’ll be layin’ of you out the same as Jim.)
Jim as lies there in the dug-out wiv ‘is blanket round ‘is ‘ead,
To keep ‘is brains from mixin’ wiv the mud;
And ‘is face as white as putty, and ‘is overcoat all red,
Like ‘e’s spilt a bloomin’ paint-pot — but it’s blood.
And I’m tryin’ to remember of a time we wasn’t pals.
‘Ow often we’ve played ‘ookey, ‘im and me;
And sometimes it was music-‘alls, and sometimes it was gals,
And even there we ‘ad no disagree.
For when ‘e copped Mariar Jones, the one I liked the best,
I shook ‘is ‘and and loaned ‘im ‘arf a quid;
I saw ‘im through the parson’s job, I ‘elped ‘im make ‘is nest,
I even stood god-farther to the kid.
So when the war broke out, sez ‘e: “Well, wot abaht it, Joe?”
“Well, wot abaht it, lad?” sez I to ‘im.
‘Is missis made a awful fuss, but ‘e was mad to go,
(‘E always was ‘igh-sperrited was Jim).
Well, none of it’s been ‘eaven, and the most of it’s been ‘ell,
But we’ve shared our baccy, and we’ve ‘alved our bread.
We’d all the luck at Wipers, and we shaved through Noove Chapelle,
And . . . that snipin’ barstard gits ‘im on the ‘ead.
Now wot I wants to know is, why it wasn’t me was took?
I’ve only got meself, ‘e stands for three.
I’m plainer than a louse, while ‘e was ‘andsome as a dook;
‘E always was a better man than me.
‘E was goin’ ‘ome next Toosday; ‘e was ‘appy as a lark,
And ‘e’d just received a letter from ‘is kid;
And ‘e struck a match to show me, as we stood there in the dark,
When . . . that bleedin’ bullet got ‘im on the lid.
‘E was killed so awful sudden that ‘e ‘adn’t time to die.
‘E sorto jumped, and came down wiv a thud.
Them corpsy-lookin’ star-shells kept a-streamin’ in the sky,
And there ‘e lay like nothin’ in the mud.
And there ‘e lay so quiet wiv no mansard to ‘is ‘ead,
And I’m sick, and blamed if I can understand:
The pots of ‘alf and ‘alf we’ve ‘ad, and zip! like that — ‘e’s dead,
Wiv the letter of ‘is nipper in ‘is ‘and.
There’s some as fights for freedom and there’s some as fights for fun,
But me, my lad, I fights for bleedin’ ‘ate.
You can blame the war and blast it, but I ‘opes it won’t be done
Till I gets the bloomin’ blood-price for me mate.
It’ll take a bit o’ bayonet to level up for Jim;
Then if I’m spared I think I’ll ‘ave a bid,
Wiv ‘er that was Mariar Jones to take the place of ‘im,
To sorter be a farther to ‘is kid.
© by owner. provided at no charge for educational purposes
You may find this and other poems here.
Analysis (AI Assisted)
This poem is a powerful reflection of the pain, confusion, and sense of injustice that often accompanies the loss of a close comrade in war. The narrator, speaking in a colloquial, working-class voice, mourns his friend Jim, who has been killed suddenly in a battle. The rawness of the emotions is matched by the unflinching, often brutal language, creating a tone of grief tempered by anger and the deep, lingering bitterness of survival.
The poem begins with the narrator staring at Jim’s boots, trying to convince himself that his friend is still alive, even though he knows, on some level, that he’s gone. The narrator’s disbelief is palpable, and the image of Jim’s boots — one of the few remnants of his presence — symbolizes both the person he was and the void left behind. The sudden shift in the narrative, where the speaker calls out to warn someone about a sniper, immediately transports the reader into the chaotic, life-threatening environment of the trenches. This moment of transition between personal reflection and the harsh reality of warfare shows how quickly life in war shifts between intimate loss and constant, ever-present danger.
The poem then recounts the friendship between the narrator and Jim, emphasizing their camaraderie before the war. The reference to their shared experiences — playing “hookey,” attending music halls, and courting the same woman, Mariar Jones — provides a sense of normalcy and brotherhood that starkly contrasts with the violence of the war. These nostalgic moments of youthful companionship serve as a sharp reminder of the lives they led before the war took them in a different direction, one that would irrevocably change them both. The narrator’s willingness to support Jim, even in personal matters like helping him get through marriage and being a godfather to Jim’s child, speaks to the deep bond of friendship that transcends the chaos and brutality of war.
The pivotal moment in the poem comes with Jim’s death. The narrator’s tone shifts from casual reflection to one of pain and bewilderment. Jim, who had been planning to return home soon, “struck a match” to show the narrator a letter from his child, only to be shot dead in an instant. The description of Jim’s death is stark and vivid, his life extinguished so quickly that he never even had the chance to comprehend it. The line, “He was killed so awful sudden that he hadn’t time to die,” captures the tragic randomness of war — that a life can be snuffed out in a moment, without warning or meaning, even when that life was filled with promise and hope. The image of Jim’s body lying “quiet with no mansard to his head” evokes both the violence of his death and the eerie stillness that follows. His life and the plans he had for the future, symbolized by the letter in his hand, are rendered meaningless in the face of war’s senseless brutality.
The narrator’s anger and disbelief are palpable in the verses that follow. He questions why Jim, “the better man,” was the one taken, while he, less remarkable and more plain, survives. This sense of injustice is common in the aftermath of loss, where the survivor often feels guilty and confused about why fate chose them to live while their loved ones perished. The narrator’s desire for revenge is evident in the lines “I hopes it won’t be done / Till I gets the bleedin’ blood-price for me mate.” He wants retribution, not for the sake of justice or glory, but because of the personal connection to the loss of his friend. This anger is raw and real, and it shows how deeply the narrator’s grief is intertwined with the desire for vengeance — not just for the war, but for Jim.
The narrator also contemplates taking Jim’s place in the life that Jim had left behind, expressing a desire to take care of Jim’s widow, Mariar Jones, and her child. This final sentiment suggests a complicated mixture of grief, responsibility, and unfulfilled dreams. Jim’s death creates a void not just for the narrator, but for the family that Jim left behind. By considering stepping into Jim’s shoes, the narrator both honors his fallen comrade and seeks a sense of purpose and connection in a world where death and loss have become everyday occurrences.
Overall, this poem uses the personal loss of a soldier’s comrade to explore the deep, complex emotions that arise from war: grief, anger, guilt, and the search for meaning in the face of death. The narrator’s voice is both poignant and gritty, capturing the bitterness of survival and the pain of losing someone who was more than just a friend — someone who was a part of his life, his history, and his future. The poem refuses to romanticize war or heroism but instead focuses on the emotional aftermath, the rawness of loss, and the sometimes troubling, desperate need for revenge and resolution. The final image of the narrator considering taking Jim’s place in the life he left behind reinforces the complex, multifaceted nature of loss — it is not just about death, but about the ripple effect that death causes in the lives of those left behind.